wwe extreme rules 2012 vontaze burfict jimmy kimmel amzn white house correspondents dinner phoenix coyotes bruce irvin
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Deal of the Day ? 23.6? HP Spectre ONE 23-e010se Core i5 Slim all-in-one PC with trackpad
Sunday’s LogicBUY Deal is the configurable 23.6″ HP Spectre ONE 23-e010se all-in-one PC, starting at $834.99. Features: Core i5-3470T 2.9GHz Dual-core Ivy Bridge; 1GB GeForce GT 610M; 6GB RAM; 1TB hard drive, 3-in-1 card reader; Wireless-N, Bluetooth; two USB 3.0 ports; wireless keyboard and mouse; Windows 8 (64-bit) $1299.99 – $400 instant savings – 5% [...]
5 Features Apple Will Never Put On The New iPhone
Can a guy with a Vine account and a bit of stop-motion mastery outdo Apple? In the case of Australian designer Matt Willis, it appears so. The popular Viner imagines the next iPhone coming with some impossible features. If only Apple could get out of its "innovation lull" -- or have people stop setting unreasonable expectations for it.
Forget 'Pinch-To-Zoom.' What About 'Press-To-Zoom'?
Everything About This iPhone Zooms Better
When Are We Going To See A Real Apple Charger?
And When Is The 'Pasta Mode' Update Coming?
Or More Importantly, 'Chocolate Mode'?
"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/iphone-features_n_3671264.html?utm_hp_ref=technology
metro north taco bell taco bell Breezy Point Seaside Heights nj transit PSEG
Monday, July 29, 2013
How To Go About Joining A Gym For Fitness | Cosmetic Surgery ...
No matter whether you just want to lose a few pounds for a wedding, or make a total body transformation, you need to know about fitness. Are you looking for information on getting in shape? Continue reading to find some great fitness tips.
Many people think the only way to get fit is by lifting weights. There are 6 primary exercises involved in body building: pull ups, push ups, squats, handstands, and bridges.
Walking is a good way to boost fitness. For increased effort, walk by pushing off your heel and going to your toe. You can also work your arms when walking by keeping your elbows bent and swinging them after each step.
You should not be concerned if you really do not want to run or walk. Why not give biking a try? Biking can be a great way to burn some calories and save some gas. A car ride of 5 miles should take fewer than 30 minutes to bike, and riding to and from work gives you two workout sessions.
Start gardening. Many people don?t realize that beginning a garden can be quite a bit of work. It involves weeding, digging and squatting a lot. You can garden to help you burn a few extra calories a week, or you can think of other simple tasks to complete around your home.
Setting a personal goal for your fitness regimen can be a powerful motivational tool. It focuses you on the positive outcome, not how hard it will be to achieve the goal. When you set a goal you will not want to quite because you will want to meet that goal.
Don?t focus on just using crunches to strengthen your abdomen. A study at a prominent university revealed that even 250,000 crunches only burns enough calories to lose just one pound. So, if you?re only doing crunches, you aren?t doing as much work as you could be. Find other ways to exercise your abdominal muscles so you achieve the results you really want.
To lower injury risk, make sure you have proper form when walking. Walk with your shoulders back in an upright position. Put your elbows at a 90-degree angle. Your forward foot and your opposite arm should be extended at the same time. In every step, be sure that your heel initially hits the ground then roll your foot forward.
Doing crunches all the time will not help you get a defined stomach. When you work your abdomen, you strengthen and tone these muscles, but you will not burn belly fat. If you desire to have washboard abs, you need to improve your diet and also take part in cardiovascular exercise and resistance training.
Get shoes that are going to help you complete each exercise you do with ease. If you fail to wear the proper shoes for the type of workout you favor, you are in danger of sustaining an injury. Not only that, but your feet will probably feel strained and uncomfortable post-workout, which can prevent you from wanting to continue your routine.
Before using any bench to workout, give it a test. Apply pressure with your hand and fingers to see how thick the padding is. If you can easily feel the wood or metal beneath the padding, choose a different bench.
If you are looking to strengthen your leg muscles, try doing wall sits. Find a wide enough space on the wall that fits your body. Keep yourself around 18 inches away from the wall. Lean back and bend your knees until you feel you back touching the wall. After that you want to keep bending your knees so that your thighs are level to the floor, ending up so it looks like you?re sitting. Try and maintain this stance for as long as your muscles allow.
If you want to get fit and stay hip, do the dip. Your shoulders, triceps, and chest all get a good workout from a set of dips. There are several ways to do dips. It is possible to maneuver two benches closer together and use them to finish your dips. The more weight you add, the more you can build them as well.
Do some box squats to enhance your quads. Box squats adds a little power to your workout. The only equipment you require is a box that you can position behind you. Go up and down as usual, but take a 2-second break each time you hit the box.
Try to maintain 80 to 100rpm when biking to work. You will ride faster before you become tired, but put less strain on your knees. This can be determined by simply counting how many times your right leg goes up every ten seconds, and multiplying that number by six. You should go for this RPM.
Split your run into 3 segments. Begin with a reduced pace, and gradually increase it until you reach your normal pace. During the last section, try to run as fast as you can. Doing this will help you to build up your endurance, and you?ll find that you can keep running longer every time you head out.
Keep your thumbs aligned with the bar whenever you are performing back exercises. Place your thumb next to your index finger, as this will take the strain off your forearms and instead focus the workout on the back muscles. It will feel funny, but it will also target the muscles you want to develop.
When embarking on a new fitness routine, start slowly. It is important to concentrate on learning breathing techniques and correct form. This helps let you do things the correct way right from the start while also preventing any injuries from occurring.
Make sure your workout shoes fit well. Try to purchase shoes later in the day after your feet have had a chance to spread. Make sure that you can feel at least half an inch between your big toe and the shoe. You know you have enough room in the shoes when you can wiggle your toes.
When you have been injured, go back to exercising as soon as you can comfortably. Getting your muscles moving again with low-intensity exercises will get them on the path to full healing. Exercising the injured muscles stretches them and gets your oxygen and blood flowing.
Be sure to drink plenty of water. Your body often dehydrates because of muscle fibers causing heat and friction. When this happens, your body sweats as a way of reducing the heat. This can cause slight dehydration.
Yogurt is a great complement to any fitness diet. There are lots of health benefits associated with yogurt, and it can greatly help your digestive system. Yogurt has high amounts of protein and calcium. Dairy is a sound product to consume when aiming for a healthy lifestyle.
Don?t think of exercise as a workout or exercise. By calling it these kinds of names it may seem less motivating to actually go and exercise. Try using the name of the activity instead, like running or cycling.
Try and jog as much as you can in order to increase your stamina. You must start slow and then gradually build up when jogging every week. Your hate rate should be kept at approximately 3/4 your maximum heart rate. Depending on your age, this is usually between 120 and 150 beats each minute.
The advice from this article will help you better reach your personal fitness goals. Nothing should be standing in your way if you?re always motivated and you do your best to keep fit at all times by doing what?s right for you. You will notice benefits pretty fast, and they last your whole life.
About Mary Joe
Source: http://www.cosmeticsurgeryonline.net/how-to-go-about-joining-a-gym-for-fitness/
ostara andy kaufman masters 2012 tom watson kawasaki disease resurrection masters tickets
Tornado Damage: Tree Falls on House in Woodhull
WOODHULL, N.Y. -- The confirmed EF1 tornado took a serious toll on one house in Woodhull.
?We heard this noise, and my husband says what is that?? I, said I think it's the wind,? says Sharon Baker. ??So I opened the door, and I said oh, it is the wind.? It sounded like a freight train coming right through the house.?
Sharon and Ron Baker have lived on County Route 102 near the Woodhull Raceway for more than 40 years, but Ron says he's never seen anything like this.
When the tornado hit their property Saturday night, they lost eight trees, one right on their house, which destroyed their back porch and caused cracks in their ceilings.
?We tried to go to bed, but neither of us really slept,? Sharon says.
Behind their property, a path of flattened crops is more than enough evidence for National Weather Service Meteorologist Dave Nicosia.
?It has all the signatures, you could see the way the winds were swirling into the tornado,? he says.? ?I have winds in some places up to 100 miles per hour, which ranks at an EF 1 category, so a pretty significant tornado.?
When we checked in with the Bakers, they were going on more than 16 hours without power.
NYSEG shut it off because of wires caught in the tree that fell on their house.
The Bakers might be most upset by the loss of one oak tree in particular.
?My kids grew up with a tire swing on this, it was probably 225 year old? and now it's gone,? Sharon says.
The Bakers' insurance will take care of the tree on their house and the damage it suffered, but they are financially responsible for clearing up the other trees.
angela corey e news bradley manning Money in the Bank 2013 Zimmerman Verdict Casey Anthony Pregnant Home Run Derby 2013
Sony Vaio VPCSB2ZDZ Smart Network Software 3.12.0.08100 for Windows 8
This utility installs the originally shipped version of the VAIO Smart Network software.
Important Notes
- During the installation of this file, be sure that you are logged in as the Administrator or as a user with Administrative rights.
- To ensure that no other program interferes with the installation, save all work and close all other programs. The Taskbar should be clear of applications before proceeding.
- Print out these instructions for use as a reference during the installation process.
It is highly recommended to always use the most recent driver version available.
Do not forget to check with our site as often as possible in order to stay updated on the latest drivers, software and games.
Try to set a system restore point before installing a device driver. This will help if you installed a wrong driver. Problems can arise when your hardware device is too old or not supported any longer.
bestbuy gamestop black friday deals Sephora Cyber Monday 2012 Walmart.com detroit lions
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Ten Years of Tort Reform in Texas: A Review
Abstract
Ten years of tort reform have provided greater access to health care and helped make Texas the nation?s leading job producer. Indeed, by recognizing the causal connection between economic prosperity and efficient, fair courts, the Texas legislature passed and Governor Rick Perry signed House Bill 4 (HB4)?powerful tort reform legislation that is the foundation of the Texas economic miracle. Yet, despite the awesome economic growth and increased access to health care triggered by HB4, members of the trial bar are still working to overturn this reform. While Texans should stand their ground and rebuff efforts to undo HB4?s successful tort reforms, all Americans should take notice of Texas?s remarkable transformation and look to enact similar reforms in their own states.The causal connection between economic prosperity and efficient, fair courts is stronger than most people realize. The simple fact is that free people using free markets need a strong judicial system: Fair markets require fair courts. The freedoms and rights enumerated in the U.S. Constitution can be guaranteed only through the justice system. For instance, personal property rights need to be protected. Contracts need to be enforced or damages paid. People need to be able to rely on product safeties and warranties.
Without an effective judicial system, our freedoms and our free enterprise system decay: Rights become uncertain, contracts are ambiguous, and personal property loses value. Simply put, strong, fair courts equal certainty. Arbitrary justice equals economic inefficiency and comes with a huge cost to America?s economic system.
Americans? rights need to be protected through a well-balanced system. While those who have been harmed need a fair and adequate remedy, individuals who have done no wrong need to be protected from those seeking unjust damages. And those who have done nothing wrong have the right to keep their money and to have their lack of responsibility for any alleged injury suffered by a plaintiff adjudicated quickly.
A Judicial Hellhole
Ten years ago, Texas was known as one of the nation?s ?judicial hellholes.?[1] The state?s system of justice allowed for laws to be applied arbitrarily. Enforcement of personal property rights and contracts varied depending on which local court had the case. Furthermore, certain counties had bad reputations regardless of the court. Judicial outcomes often depended on which attorney was before which judge in which county. Equal enforcement of the state?s laws was simply not a certainty upon which a citizen could rely.
This problem was not new to Texas. Thirty years before Texas was proclaimed a judicial hellhole, the governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker empowered Page Keeton, the well-respected dean of the University of Texas Law School, to study the problem and offer legally sound solutions. In 1975, the Keeton Commission proposed the state?s first cap on medical malpractice damages.[2] In order to stem the adverse effects of litigation on doctors, the Texas legislature passed its first tort reform law in 1977, establishing a cap on all medical malpractice damages except medical expenses.[3]
In 1988, however, the plaintiffs? lawyer?backed Texas Supreme Court held that the cap violated the Texas Constitution?s ?open courts? provision and ruled the law unconstitutional.[4] The state?s constitutional provision provides only that the courts of the state shall be open to the public. The court?s interpretation was a stretch, but the trial bar got what it wanted?the opportunity to sue physicians and hospitals for unlimited damages.
As there is no reason to pursue a claim against someone who is incapable of satisfying a judgment, doctors became easy targets because they had assets or insurance with which a judgment could be satisfied. Consequently, the number of lawsuits against medical professionals jumped, malpractice insurance rates climbed, and doctors were forced to purchase more coverage. And with more coverage came even more lawsuits. The spiraling cost of medical malpractice insurance premiums to physicians was having more than an economic effect: Texans were losing access to health care professionals as doctors left the profession or fled the state.
The success of the plaintiffs? bar spilled over into many other businesses. For example, engineers were now being sued for ?negligent design,? which resulted in a similar insurance premium spiral. This scenario played out yet again with bank officers, then corporate officers, and on and on all the way to the boards of directors of charities and small-business owners. The economic transfer of wealth from professionals and business owners to plaintiffs? lawyers with the imprimatur of Texas?s courts was pronounced.
In other words, those who had done nothing wrong and who did not deserve to be held civilly liable were not keeping their hard-earned money in their pockets or investing it in expanding their businesses. By 2003, the Texas tort system was a mess. For example:
- One out of every four doctors in Texas had a malpractice claim filed against him or her each year.
- 85 percent of all medical malpractice claims failed but still cost more than $50,000 to defend.
- The number of medical malpractice insurers in Texas dropped from 17 in 2000 to only four in 2003. One of the four was the State of Texas as the insurer of last resort.
- Class action defendants almost always settled once the class was certified by the trial judge. Class certification was seldom subject to appellate review, thereby allowing the trial judge almost exclusive autonomy in deciding whether to certify a class. Because of the risk of disastrous results and the costs involved in defending against a class action lawsuit, defendants just settled once the class was certified.
- Plaintiffs were given too much latitude in choosing in which county to bring suit. Forum shopping was prevalent. Counties with no nexus to the parties or the case were chosen because plaintiffs? lawyers thought the judge or the jury pool in that county were likely to favor them.
- Thousands of non-impaired plaintiffs from all over the country were filing asbestosis and silicosis and even ?industrial dust? cases in a few Texas counties. All but a few of the plaintiffs were healthy. Many had no exposure, and some had never even set foot in the state.
- Innocent property owners were held 100 percent responsible for the actions of trespassing criminals.
Doctors responded to the crisis by leaving the state, limiting their practice, or retiring early. Texas had one of the lowest doctor-to-citizen ratios in the country,[5] and it was getting worse. The physician shortage?particularly of specialists, who are most often the target of malpractice claims?was most pronounced in the state?s most litigious counties. For example, there was not a single neurosurgeon south of San Antonio. Furthermore, one hundred Texas counties did not have a pediatrician, and 154 did not have an obstetrician.
The unfair tort system was not just hurting the state?s economy; it was posing a severe risk to those Texans who most needed to see a doctor. Expectant mothers, children, those who were injured in accidents, those who needed specialists, and the families of patients were all paying a personal price for the lack of fairness in the Texas court system.
The lawyers benefiting from the unbalanced court system were clever enough to invest in the political careers of legislators who would not adopt Dean Keeton?s thoughtful proposals. From 1988 until 2003, legislation designed to balance the Texas state courts stayed bottled up in committee or was defeated on the floor of the legislature. The trial lawyers? lobby was one of the most powerful and effective in maintaining its hold on the state?s court system.
House Bill 4
In 2003, for the first time since Reconstruction, the citizens of Texas elected a Republican majority to the Texas House of Representatives?a great number of whom were interested in reforming the state?s tort system. With the legislature no longer beholden to the special interests of the trial bar, Governor Rick Perry (R) declared medical malpractice reform legislation to be an emergency issue. The legislature took on the task of balancing the laws of the state to protect the rights of both those who had been wronged and those who had done no wrong.
The policy discussion of bringing efficiency, equity, and balance to the Texas court system centered around House Bill 4 (HB4), the omnibus tort reform bill. This bill contained procedural, substantive, evidentiary, medical malpractice, and general civil reforms needed to extinguish the litigation crisis. Interestingly, HB4 contained nothing particularly new or innovative to American jurisprudence. Instead, the reforms were modeled after laws adopted in other states or procedures used in the federal court system. The only unique thing about HB4 was that so many reforms were contained in one bill.
The common-sense reforms written into HB4, which were designed to end legal gamesmanship, included:
- Juries should hear more evidence about who may really be at fault.
- Only those individuals who cause harm should pay and then only to the extent of their own fault.
- Damages should be limited to what the plaintiff paid or incurred or what someone paid or incurred on their behalf, thereby eliminating ?phantom damages.?[6]
- In a malpractice case:
- A medical report written by a physician in the same or similar field as the physician being sued should be submitted within 120 days of the filing of a lawsuit, clearly identifying the appropriate standard of care, how the standard of care was violated, and the damages that resulted from the violation of the standard of care.
- Non-economic damages should be capped at $250,000 for any and all doctors sued with an additional cap of $250,000 for each of up to two medical care institutions.
- Other procedural and substantive devices, such as forum shopping, used to tilt the scales of justice would be eliminated.
After extensive hearings before the House Committee on Civil Practices, HB4, a 96-page bill, was presented for debate to the full House. The floor debate in the House went on for a remarkable eight days, often late into the night and early morning. To date, it is the most extensively debated bill in the history of the State of Texas. Three hundred and seventy-five floor amendments comprising over 650 pages designed to gut the reforms in the bill were filed.
At almost midnight on the eighth day of debate, 98 House Members from both parties supported the strong lawsuit reforms and finally passed HB4. The bill then went to the Senate, where the debate was similarly exhaustive. Twenty-seven Members of the Senate supported the substantive and procedural changes in HB4 designed to bring about a fair court system, and on June 11, 2003, the governor signed the bill into law.[7]
With bipartisan support, the legislature also passed Texas Constitutional Amendment Proposition 12.[8] This proposal asked the voters to amend the state constitution to give HB4 full effect and overturn the 1988 Texas Supreme Court decision against caps on non-economic damages. The citizens voted to adopt Proposition 12, and in September 2003, HB4 became the law in Texas.[9]
Shortly thereafter, The Wall Street Journal heralded the changes adopted in HB4 as ?Ten Gallon Tort Reform.?[10] HB4 has been referred to as a model bill by a number of commentators because it addressed so many procedural, substantive, common law, and statutory law changes needed to bring the court system in Texas back into balance.
The Results of Reform
In the almost 10-year period since the reforms were passed, it is possible to discern whether the reforms worked, whether any of the reforms went too far in abridging the rights of plaintiffs, and whether the stated goal of increasing access to health care was achieved. By any measure, HB4 has achieved its stated goals. Just four years after HB4 passed, The New York Times observed:
Four years after Texas voters approved a constitutional amendment limiting awards in medical malpractice lawsuits, doctors are responding as supporters predicted, arriving from all parts of the country to swell the ranks of specialists at Texas hospitals and bring professional healthcare to some long-underserved rural areas.[11]
Indeed, a former president of the Texas Trial Lawyers Association stated that it is unlikely that the volume of tort lawsuits will ever exceed one-half to two-thirds of pre-reform levels. This is a strong admission that many past suits should never have been filed at all and that the reforms in HB4 are working to discourage the filing of non-meritorious lawsuits.
In May 2005, the American Medical Association removed Texas from its list of states in crisis.[12] Texas is so far the only state to be removed from this list.
So The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, the Texas Trial Lawyers Association, and the American Medical Association have all agreed that HB4 worked to achieve its goals.
The reform bill?s most significant achievements have been increased access to health care and an unanticipated positive economic impact on the Texas economy. By the end of 2013, 10 years and three months after the effective date of HB4, the number of licensed physicians in the state will almost have doubled.[13] It is anticipated that Texas will have somewhere close to 60,000 doctors to care for its citizens, almost twice as many as it had in 2003. The number of physicians in Texas is now growing at twice the rate of the state?s population?a statistic that helps prove the success of HB4?s reforms in increasing access to health care.
What is even more impressive, however, is how many physicians are moving to Texas from other states. Rural communities are adding needed specialists, and medical centers in Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, and San Antonio are expanding at unprecedented rates.[14] For example, the border community of El Paso has added more than 200 physicians, including orthopedic surgeons, emergency care specialists, pulmonologists, pediatricians, internists, anesthesiologists, family practice doctors, oncologists, and pediatric cardiologists since 2003.[15] Additionally, Memorial Hermann Hospital System added?in just one year?26 pediatric subspecialists; a normal year before enactment of HB4 would have resulted in just one or two new subspecialists.
Indeed, evidence of HB4?s success is everywhere. For instance:
- CHRISTUS Health, a not-for-profit Catholic health system with hospitals throughout Texas, saved so much on its liability costs that it expanded its charity care by $100 million per year starting in 2004. Total cost-basis charity care in Texas was $594 million greater in 2006 than it was in 2003.[16] Sister Michele O?Brien of CHRISTUS stated that the expanded charity care is a direct result of the lawsuit reforms.[17]
- Texas Children?s Hospital is completing a multibillion-dollar expansion that it could not have undertaken without the lawsuit reforms in HB4.[18] This expansion is just in health care facilities and does not include the increased number of physicians, nurses, and support staff that accompany such a huge hardscape build-out. In fact, the total health care facilities expansion in the state attributable to HB4 exceeds $10 billion.[19] While the numbers have been impressive, even more impressive is the impact this has had on patients.
- Individuals have seen their lives improve as well. Consider the case of George Rodriguez, a man who lives in Corpus Christi, a city that did not have a neurosurgeon before HB4. One day, suffering from back pain, Mr. Rodriguez went to the emergency room and was seen by Dr. Matthew Alexander,[20] a neurosurgeon who had moved to Corpus Christi from out of state and had opened his practice one week beforehand specifically because of HB4. It turns out that Mr. Rodriguez had a spinal abscess, a life-threatening condition if not treated within the hour. Before Dr. Alexander opened his practice in Corpus Christi, a patient needing a neurosurgeon would be stabilized as best as possible and flown to Houston. The flight itself is about 45 minutes. In George Rodriguez?s case, there was no stabilizing option: He would have died or been permanently crippled unless he received immediate treatment. Fortunately, Dr. Alexander was there to operate on Mr. Rodriguez, thereby saving his life. Though Mr. Rodriguez still has a limp, he is, like many other patients in Texas, a big supporter of HB4.
These examples are not unique. The saving and improving of lives is a direct result of increased access to health care, which in turn is the direct result of the positive effect that HB4?s reforms have had on medical malpractice insurance rates.
A Tale of Two States
In 2003, Texas physicians were paying about the same malpractice rates as were doctors in New York. Physicians were struggling to pay their malpractice premiums and keep their practices open. A crisis in access to health care was facing both states.
Texas chose to adopt reasonable, common-sense lawsuit reforms. As a result, the malpractice insurance premiums paid by Texas doctors have fallen by more than 60 percent on average. Consequently, most Texas doctors are paying less than half of what they were paying 10 years ago.[21]
In contrast, malpractice premiums in New York have increased by 60 percent. As a result, almost 2,000 physicians have moved their practices from New York to Texas. To stem the loss of New York doctors moving to other jurisdictions, New York enacted legislation requiring the State of New York to subsidize the malpractice insurance costs of doctors, ignoring the problems in the state?s legal system that generated the high premium rates.[22] This means that taxpayers in New York are paying New York trial lawyers through the conduit of frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits. The State of New York is not working to eliminate frivolous suits; it is encouraging them.
The contrast between the effective and common-sense reforms adopted by Texas and New York?s nonsensical backdoor payments to trial lawyers is a perfect example of why Texas is the nation?s leading job producer. Dr. Ray Perryman reports that almost 10 percent of Texas?s economic growth is directly attributable to tort reform legislation.[23] Combined with a low tax climate, Texas?s stable court system has led to the state?s becoming home to more Fortune 500 companies than any other state except California. Governor Perry has publicly stated that this economic growth could not have been accomplished without HB4.
Preserving the Texas Miracle
While the past 10 years have shown a causal connection between economic success and fair courts in a free enterprise system, the trial bar is still working to unravel the reforms in HB4. Some want to eliminate the pre-trial report; others seek the re-establishment of phantom damages; plaintiffs? lawyers want unlimited non-economic damages.
However, these are not the kind of changes that most Texans are seeking. Instead, they want jobs, access to health care, and opportunity.
Texas has balanced its courts, improved its economy, increased access to health care, and provided remedies to those who have been wronged as well as protected the rights of the innocent. Texas should stand its ground and rebuff efforts to undo one of the foundations of the Texas economic miracle, and other states should look to Texas?s 10-year successful reform as an example to follow.
?Joseph Nixon is a partner at Beirne Maynard & Parsons, LLP. In 2003, he was in the Texas State Legislature and Chairman of the House Committee on Civil Practices. He authored HB4 and the constitutional amendment, Proposition 12, which authorized the cap on non-economic damages.Source: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/ten-years-of-tort-reform-in-texas-a-review
16 and pregnant ludwig mies van der rohe jamie lynn sigler mega millions jackpot black panther party frank martin pink slime
Blackmagic's 4K camera delayed, Pocket Cinema model to ship in '3-4 days'
If you've pre-ordered one of the two Blackmagic cinema cams announced at NAB this year, there's good, not-so-good and bad news coming out of a Blackmagic event yesterday. First the good: Blackmagic's Pocket Cinema model, which stunned observers with its 2K RAW specs and sub-$1,000 price tag, should start shipping in a few days. That's close to the July 25th date promised for both cameras, although there could be a not-so-good caveat. John Brawley (who showed off the Pocket Cinema's first pristine images) told forum users that it would likely only have ProRes 422 support, and not RAW, at first -- though Blackmagic told us they "couldn't confirm" that. As for the bad part, those who laid down the most cash ($4,000 or so) will have to wait for the Production Camera 4K. The company told event-goers it wouldn't arrive until early September now, but when we reached out for clarification, it gave the following statement:
With regards to the Production Camera 4K there is still several weeks of work to do before this enters full production manufacturing, however we expect to ship the first quantities of this model before the end of August.
Still, given the company's track record of delays with the original Cinema Camera, you may want to avoid relying on that info for any time-specific projects.
Filed under: Cameras
Via: NoFilmSchool
Source: Ogy Stoilov (Twitter), dvinfo.net forums
Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/vhy9pTLRHf8/
Yeezus Flag Day 2013 UFC 161 College World Series Alex Cobb superman flag day
Saturday, July 27, 2013
It Is Not Good News That Obamacare Will Create Lots of Jobs to Steer People Through the System
"Which way is up?" reporting makes a big-time appearance in this Washington Post article telling us that Obamacare will create a boom in jobs since workers will have to be hired to steer people through the system. The article reports:
"About 7,000 to 9,000 new customer service agents will be needed to man phones and Web chats for the marketplace, called an exchange, the federal government will run for more than half of the states, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said. Additional agents will be needed for exchanges run by the states themselves."
The next paragraph raises the stakes to:
"Altogether, tens of thousands of people could be hired over the next several years to set up and support the online marketplaces, according to some estimates."
Okay, let's make it three tens of thousands (a.k.a. 30,000). If we continue to create jobs at the rate of 170,000 a month (an assumption, not a forecast), then we will create 6.1 million jobs. This means that our 30,000 Obamacare jobs will be a bit less than 0.5 percent of net job creation over this period. That's a plus, but not exactly a boom.
More importantly, the jobs needed to steer people through the system are a waste from the standpoint of the economy as a whole. In an efficient system people can figure out how to get their health care without needing a consultant to guide them through a complex process. The fact that Obamacare may require people for this task means that it is adding waste to the health care system.
In a recession, anything that employs people can be seen as positive since otherwise they would sit home doing nothing. However if we envision at some point that we will be back to something resembling full employment, it would be much better to have a health care system that did not require tens of thousands of workers to explain insurance options to people.?
(Only one link allowed per comment)
labor day college football scores khan academy Espn College Football Eddie Murphy died Suzanne Barr Clint Eastwood speech
Yahoo! News - Latest News & Headlines
Source: http://rss.news.yahoo.com/rss/software
living social pnc Pain and Gain Eddie Lacy Justin Pugh dallas cowboys Jarvis Jones
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)